• 回答数

    7

  • 浏览数

    269

淡水氤氲
首页 > 期刊论文 > 简爱小论文题目

7个回答 默认排序
  • 默认排序
  • 按时间排序

丝雨如薇

已采纳

人间自有真情在

322 评论

善美梅子

《简·爱》,不简单的爱

304 评论

月影星云

<简爱>读后感难道就因为我一贫如洗,默默无闻,长相平庸,个子瘦小,就没有灵魂,没有心肠了——你想错了,我的心灵跟你一样丰富,我的心胸一样充实! ——《简爱》夏洛蒂 《简爱》是英国文学史上的一部经典传世之作,它成功地塑造了英国文学史中第一个对爱情、生活、社会以及宗教都采取了独立自主的积极进取态度和敢于斗争、敢于争取自由平等地位的女性形象。 大凡喜爱外国文学作品的女性,都喜欢读夏洛蒂的《简爱》。如果我们认为夏洛蒂仅仅只为写这段缠绵的爱情而写《简爱》。我想,错了。作者也是一位女性,生活在波动变化着的英国19世纪中叶,那时思想有着一个崭新的开始。而在《简爱》里渗透最多的也就是这种思想——女性的独立意识。让我们试想一下,如果简爱的独立,早已被扼杀在寄人篱下的童年生活里;如果她没有那份独立,她早已和有妻女的罗切斯特生活在一起,开始有金钱,有地位的新生活;如果她没有那份纯洁,我们现在手中的《简爱》也不再是令人感动的流泪的经典。所以,我开始去想,为什么《简爱》让我们感动,爱不释手——就是她独立的性格,令人心动的人格魅力。 然而,我们不禁要问,仅这一步就能独立吗?我认为,不会的。毕竟女性的独立是一个长期的过程,不是一蹴而就的。它需要一种彻底的勇气,就像简爱当年毅然离开罗切斯特一样,需要“风潇潇兮易水寒,壮土一去兮不复返”的豪迈和胆量。我想,这应该才是最关键的一步,也应该是走向独立的决定性的一步。而夏洛蒂笔下的简爱却把她倔强的性格,独立的个性留给我们一个感动。所以她是成功的,幸福的女性。 简爱已作为独立女性的经典,我希望阳光下,鲜花里有更多的简爱走出来,不管是贫穷,还是富有;不管是美貌,还是相貌平庸,都有美好的心灵和充实的心胸,都能以独立的人格和坚强的个性生活。从这本书中,可以看出它塑造了一个体现新兴阶级的某些要求的女性形象,刻画了工业革命时期的时代精神对简爱,我有的是欣赏和赞美。她追求独立的人格,追求男女之间精神的平等。虽经历不幸却热爱生活,并把爱带给每个需要她的人。为了自己的爱的信念,平等的真实纯粹的爱,甚至毅然放弃渴望以久的唾手可得的爱情,并最终也自己的爱人实现了精神上的平等,简爱的一生,虽谈不上轰轰烈烈,但却是平凡而不平庸。在我心中,简爱就像一个充满智慧、充满爱心并努力使自己生命得到最大张扬的精灵。她的生命,有如彗星的闪亮和美丽。 然而,最打动我心的却是海轮,一个同样充满智慧和爱心的小姑娘。海伦——我心目中超凡美丽的天使。她超凡,是因为她完全放弃现世,达到了浩淼高远的精神境界,有着难以比拟的忍耐精神。她美丽,毋庸置疑,有哪个人心目中的天使不美丽呢? 海伦的超凡是常人无法企及的,也是常人无法理解的。包括简爱。海伦在人世的生命虽然短暂,但却发出了流星般耀眼的光芒。海轮的一生,有如落日一般辉煌与悲壮,这是一种崇高的美,豁达的美,气势磅礴的美,可歌可泣的美。 还记得那次梦中醒来,努力搜集所有有关海伦的语言和描述。不知为什么,对她的死就是有一种不甘。令我感到欣慰的是发现了一段被自己忽略了的细节,书中是这样描述的“在海伦的墓碑上有这么一个拉丁文,Resurgam意思是我将再生”。 一股郁结也心胸的感伤终于释怀了。我欣然,释然。“Resurgam”不正象征了海伦的崇高精神永存不灭吗? 我想,这也是对海伦的死的最好的诠释。

195 评论

叶子晓桐

女人的尊严与爱——《简爱》读后感尊严与爱——《简·爱》读后感读《简·爱》有感

252 评论

天上的叮叮猫儿

- - 自己写吧孩子

318 评论

蒋馨瑗SHELLEY

Jane EyreThe development of Jane Eyre’s character is central to the novel. From the beginning, Jane possesses a sense of her self-worth and dignity, a commitment to justice and principle, a trust in God, and a passionate disposition. Her integrity is continually tested over the course of the novel, and Jane must learn to balance the frequently conflicting aspects of herself so as to find here to find out more!An orphan since early childhood, Jane feels exiled and ostracized at the beginning of the novel, and the cruel treatment she receives from her Aunt Reed and her cousins only exacerbates her feeling of alienation. Afraid that she will never find a true sense of home or community, Jane feels the need to belong somewhere, to find “kin,” or at least “kindred spirits.” This desire tempers her equally intense need for autonomy and her search for freedom, Jane also struggles with the question of what type of freedom she wants. While Rochester initially offers Jane a chance to liberate her passions, Jane comes to realize that such freedom could also mean enslavement—by living as Rochester’s mistress, she would be sacrificing her dignity and integrity for the sake of her feelings. St. John Rivers offers Jane another kind of freedom: the freedom to act unreservedly on her principles. He opens to Jane the possibility of exercising her talents fully by working and living with him in India. Jane eventually realizes, though, that this freedom would also constitute a form of imprisonment, because she would be forced to keep her true feelings and her true passions always in Brontë may have created the character of Jane Eyre as a means of coming to terms with elements of her own life. Much evidence suggests that Brontë, too, struggled to find a balance between love and freedom and to find others who understood her. At many points in the book, Jane voices the author’s then-radical opinions on religion, social class, and RochesterDespite his stern manner and not particularly handsome appearance, Edward Rochester wins Jane’s heart, because she feels they are kindred spirits, and because he is the first person in the novel to offer Jane lasting love and a real home. Although Rochester is Jane’s social and economic superior, and although men were widely considered to be naturally superior to women in the Victorian period, Jane is Rochester’s intellectual equal. Moreover, after their marriage is interrupted by the disclosure that Rochester is already married to Bertha Mason, Jane is proven to be Rochester’s moral regrets his former libertinism and lustfulness; nevertheless, he has proven himself to be weaker in many ways than Jane. Jane feels that living with Rochester as his mistress would mean the loss of her dignity. Ultimately, she would become degraded and dependent upon Rochester for love, while unprotected by any true marriage bond. Jane will only enter into marriage with Rochester after she has gained a fortune and a family, and after she has been on the verge of abandoning passion altogether. She waits until she is not unduly influenced by her own poverty, loneliness, psychological vulnerability, or passion. Additionally, because Rochester has been blinded by the fire and has lost his manor house at the end of the novel, he has become weaker while Jane has grown in strength—Jane claims that they are equals, but the marriage dynamic has actually tipped in her . John RiversClick here to find out more!St. John Rivers is a foil to Edward Rochester. Whereas Rochester is passionate, St. John is austere and ambitious. Jane often describes Rochester’s eyes as flashing and flaming, whereas she constantly associates St. John with rock, ice, and snow. Marriage with Rochester represents the abandonment of principle for the consummation of passion, but marriage to St. John would mean sacrificing passion for principle. When he invites her to come to India with him as a missionary, St. John offers Jane the chance to make a more meaningful contribution to society than she would as a housewife. At the same time, life with St. John would mean life without true love, in which Jane’s need for spiritual solace would be filled only by retreat into the recesses of her own soul. Independence would be accompanied by loneliness, and joining St. John would require Jane to neglect her own legitimate needs for love and emotional support. Her consideration of St. John’s proposal leads Jane to understand that, paradoxically, a large part of one’s personal freedom is found in a relationship of mutual emotional BurnsHelen Burns, Jane’s friend at Lowood School, serves as a foil to Mr. Brocklehurst as well as to Jane. While Mr. Brocklehurst embodies an evangelical form of religion that seeks to strip others of their excessive pride or of their ability to take pleasure in worldly things, Helen represents a mode of Christianity that stresses tolerance and acceptance. Brocklehurst uses religion to gain power and to control others; Helen ascetically trusts her own faith and turns the other cheek to Lowood’s harsh Helen manifests a certain strength and intellectual maturity, her efforts involve self-negation rather than self-assertion, and Helen’s submissive and ascetic nature highlights Jane’s more headstrong character. Like Jane, Helen is an orphan who longs for a home, but Helen believes that she will find this home in Heaven rather than Northern England. And while Helen is not oblivious to the injustices the girls suffer at Lowood, she believes that justice will be found in God’s ultimate judgment—God will reward the good and punish the evil. Jane, on the other hand, is unable to have such blind faith. Her quest is for love and happiness in this world. Nevertheless, she counts on God for support and guidance in her search.我给你写了真么多,一定要给我加悬赏金 我在此谈谈读巨著《简爱》的读后感,当我合上简爱这本书之后,我深深的被Jane Erye(简爱)所打动,她是如此善良而优秀的女人。Eyre夫人有一颗金子般的心。她真爱着她身旁的每个人,并且真诚的给予他们帮助,她自重,并且做每件事都很优秀,我非常喜欢她。她不仅仅是我的老师还是我的挚友,每当我迷惘的时候,我就会想到她,想到她如果是此时的我将会怎么做,为什么不去读我的朋友《简爱》! Let me tell what I feel after reading the great work Jane was really move by Jane Erye after closing the a kind and good woman!Mrs Eyre had a heart of really loved everyone around her,and gave others help sincerely(真诚地).She respected(尊重) herself and did her best to do really love are both a great teacher and a good friend of when I am confuse(迷惑的),I will think of will imagine what will she do if she is not read Jane Erye my friends!小说设计了一个很光明的结尾.罗彻斯特的庄园毁了,他本人也成了一个残废..在这样的情况下,简爱不再在尊严和爱之间矛盾.而同时获得满足-------她和罗彻斯特的结婚是有尊严的,同时也是有爱的. 小说告诉我们,人们最美好的生活就是尊严加爱.小说的结局按排的这是这样一种生活.虽然我觉得这样的结局过于完美,这样的完美有点浮浅..但我依然尊重作者对这种生活的美好理想.就是-------尊严加爱/ The novel tells us that the best people to increase the dignity of life is love. Novels by the end of the row that this is such a life. Although I think this kind of outcome is too perfect, so perfect .. a little superficial, but I still respect this author The ideal of a better kind of life. ------- Is to increase the dignity of love / In modern society, few people will like Jane Eyre, for the love for the character and abandon all, and without looking back.'s Whole-hearted pursuit of pay, and pure like a glass of ice water ....... Jane eyreEnglish: Jane eyre is a novel color autobiography, it explains the theme: people's value = dignity + . Love living in a parents, sponsor, grew up under the environment of treatment with peers, aunt abandon, cousin contempt, cousin insults and beating of a child... this is the dignity of the ruthless trample, but perhaps because it all, Jane. Love and faith of infinite indomitable spirit, a kind of inner personality can rochester, she never because he is a teacher and the family status meanness, but that they feel inferior is equal. Should not because she is a servant, but not respected by others. Also because of her integrity, noble and pure heart, no pollution, secular society for the shock, and rochester her as a spiritual and equality in the conversation, and slowly and deeply in love with eyre itself to us is a kind of simplified, is a fanpiaoguizhen, is a kind of pursuit of whole heart feeling, is a kind of simplified feelings and neglected, it is like a cup of water, purify every reader's heart, also cause readers, especially female readers简爱》 中文:《简爱》是一部带有自传色彩的长篇小说,它阐释了这样一个主题:人的价值=尊严+爱。 简。爱生存在一个父母双亡,寄人篱下的环境,从小就承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇,姨妈的嫌弃,表姐的蔑视,表哥的侮辱和毒打……这是对一个孩子的尊严的无情践踏,但也许正是因为这一切,换回了简。爱无限的信心和坚强不屈的精神,一种可战胜的内在人格力量。 在罗切斯特的面前,她从不因为自己是一个地位低贱的家庭教师而感到自卑,反而认为他们是平等的。不应该因为她是仆人,而不能受到别人的尊重。也正因为她的正直,高尚,纯洁,心灵没有受到世俗社会的污染,使得罗切斯特为之震撼,并把她看做了一个可以和自己在精神上平等交谈的人,并且慢慢地深深爱上了她。《简爱》所展现给我们的正是一种化繁为简,是一种返朴归真,是一种追求全心付出的感觉,是一种不计得失的简化的感情,它犹如一杯冰水,净化每一个读者的心灵,同时引起读者,特别是女性读者的共鸣。

218 评论

带嘴过日子

《简爱》是一本具有多年历史的文学著作。至今已152年的历史了。它的成功在于它详细的内容,精彩的片段。在译序中,它还详细地介绍了《简爱》的作者一些背景故事。 从中我了解到了作者夏洛蒂.勃郎特的许多事。她出生在一个年经济困顿、多灾多难的家庭;居住在一个远离尘器的穷乡僻壤;生活在革命势头正健,国家由农民向工业国过渡,新兴资产阶级日益壮大的时代,这些都给她的小说创作上打上了可见的烙印。 可惜,上帝似乎毫不吝啬的塑造了这个天才们。有似乎急不可耐伸出了毁灭之手。这些才华横溢的儿女,都无一例外的先于父亲再人生的黄金时间离开了人间。惜乎,勃郎特姐妹! 《简爱》这本小说,主要通过简.爱与罗切斯特之间一波三折的爱情故事,塑造了一个出生低微、生活道路曲折,却始终坚持维护独立人格、追求个性自由、主张人生平等、不向人生低头的坚强女性。 简.爱生存在一个父母双亡,寄人篱下的环境。从小就承受着与同龄人不一样的待遇:姨妈的嫌弃,表姐的蔑视,表哥的侮辱和毒打......然而,她并没有绝望,她并没有自我摧毁,并没有在侮辱中沉沦.所带来的种种不幸的一切,相反,换回的却是简.爱的无限信心,却是简.爱的坚强不屈的精神,一种可战胜的内在人格力量. 不幸,在学习生活中,简.爱仍然是承受着肉体上的受罚和心灵上的催残.学校的施主罗可赫斯特不但当着全校师生的面诋毁她,而且把她置于耻辱台上示众.使她在全校师生面前丢尽了脸.但简.爱仍坚强不屈,化悲愤为力量,不但在学习上飞速进步,而且也取得了师生们的理解. 不久,简.爱又陷入了爱情的旋涡.个性及强的她同样保持着个人高贵的尊严,在情敌面前显得大家闺秀,毫不逊色,对于英格拉姆小姐的咄咄逼人,她从容面对. 同样, 在罗切斯特的面前,她从不因为自己是一个地位低贱的家庭教师,而感到自卑,她认为他们是平等的.不应该因为她是仆人,而不能受到别人的尊重.也正因为她的正直,高尚,纯洁,心灵没有受到世俗社会的污染。使得罗切斯特感到自惭性秽,同时对她肃然起敬,并深深地爱上了她。他的真心,让她感动,她接受了他.后来,简.爱发现罗切斯特已有了妻子,她的自尊自重再次出现,毫不犹豫地离开了他,她对爱情的专一,让我敬佩. 最后,简.爱得知,罗切斯特为了拯救在活中的妻子不幸双目失明.躯体严重残疾,完全丧失了生活能力,而同时又妻亡财毁.简.爱全身心的爱再次投入了他的怀抱...... 从这本书中,可以看出它塑造了一个体现新兴阶级的某些要求的女性形象,刻画了工业革命时期的时代精神

307 评论

相关问答

  • 简爱的论文题目

    你的论文准备往什么方向写,选题老师审核通过了没,有没有列个大纲让老师看一下写作方向? 老师有没有和你说论文往哪个方向写比较好?写论文之前,一定要写个大纲,这样

    晴天夹心 3人参与回答 2023-12-06
  • 简爱的英文论文题目

    论文题目是每个学校都有规定的。比如说:文学方面的,商务方面的~~你不要太着急,还是要看看你们学院的要求~按照要求下手,事半功倍哦~o(∩_∩)o... 题目推荐

    ERICA漠漠 6人参与回答 2023-12-08
  • 爱格小说杂志的简介

    爱格是: 奇幻、玄幻、科幻类小说。 《爱格》是2007年山东出版集团出版的杂志,天使文化旗下爱格杂志社编辑发行,半月刊,分别为《爱格》A、B版及《爱

    haohao开心 4人参与回答 2023-12-07
  • 简爱小论文题目

    人间自有真情在

    淡水氤氲 7人参与回答 2023-12-11
  • 简爱的女权主义论文题目

    本文结合叙述学、女性主义阐述英国女作家夏洛蒂·勃朗特的《简·爱》,从作家身份,女主人公话语的角度切入,在文本细读的基础上试图证明这部作品的叙述既具有一定的叛逆性

    打怪兽789 6人参与回答 2023-12-05