毕业论文曹文轩

我是个高中生，也想出出主意，写一下自己的拙见。首先以美的总体开篇，写到表现美的方式异和同，引出。分析沈汪的生活背景，人生经历。沈笔下的力量多是生活中各种经历所凝聚出来的，汪已经算是一种比较平静的人生经历了。（主体）沈作品中的思路是自然力量养育出的一种人文，景为文的心，而汪则更偏向于以景衬文。可以举例分析。沈的写作思路像蒙蒙细雨一般，对结构的全面没有太大的苛求，只是用正常语序表达出就可以了。汪受的教育比较全面，潜移默化。文章已经包含出一种结构，如涓涓的细流了。从沈，汪的作品中，我觉得还可以与曹文轩的作品比较一下，悲痛的力量逐渐淡化着。是因为时代赋予我们的秉性再逐渐改变吧？毕竟现在的日子比过去好多了，而日子好起来了，人们也就不愿意刻意去写不曾经历的痛苦了。这只是我个人的意见，美让人神往也就在于不同的人理解的美是不同的。能从这两位先生身上学点东西，我已经很幸福了。

Abstract: Works of Cao Wen Xuan always present us a kind of feeling that can be described as perfection, carrying shangri-la like aestheticism. Generally, the picturesque aestheticism is mainly from his ideology of literature---the pursue of beauty and philanthropy, and it is indicated by the following aspects: warmth of the sorrow is what sad and pity feelings ever stated by Cao Wen Xuan, poemizing the creatures of female and description of the images. This test attempts to indicate the inside purpose of Cao Wen Xuan's aesthetical writing does not disconnect to the reality, but to pass the literary ideology of beauty and philanthropy through the aesthetical writing, moving and warming the inside of the people for re-creating another module of personlity, module that is perfection, in order that human beings can build another upstanding and solid humanity base. Key Words: Cao Wen Xuan; Beauty; Philanthropy; Moving; Humanity -------------------------------------------------------------- 翻译完了，呵呵。这是我自己翻译的。 希望对楼主有帮助。